FTST-L Archives

Archiver > FTST > 2002-01 > 1011762952


From: "Rae Jean" <>
Subject: Re: [FTST] Surety values in FTST(error or bug)
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 23:15:52 -0600
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020121222622.00a68db0@mail.btinternet.com><008201c1a2d7$c8f5b9e0$969d50d8@oemcomputer><002c01c1a35e$437e79a0$45c832d2@good> <5.1.0.14.0.20020122155238.026c1780@127.0.0.1>


Allen
Not sure if you read the messages pertaining to this topic but FSTS is
changing the placement of the surety values for relationship tags. David was
told by tech support it is a display problem correction. Personally I'd
rather the program leave my surety values alone and I'll do the edit if I
desire.

We know you can only enter a surety for P1 in the TMG Relationship tag but
FTST has taken it upon itself to move the value to P2
for the child. Take a look at the PV of #1 Frank in the sample dataset and
then open one of the child tags.

Not happy my values are being changed. <G>
Rae Jean


----- From: Allen Mellen <>
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 2:57 PM

: Display problem is a synonym for "bug."
:
: For a Relationship tag, you can only enter one surety for the relationship
: -- not one for the parent and one for the child. I wouldn't expect that to
: change in TMG5, but I could be wrong.
:
: Is it widely perceived to be a design flaw? I suspect that there are no
: plans to change it.


This thread: