GEN-FR-L Archives

Archiver > GEN-FR > 1999-04 > 0923104604


From: "Roland Grenier" <>
Subject: Re: LEFOUREUR dit CHAMPAGNE
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 1999 20:56:44 -0500


Bonsoir

Anniebe222 <> a crit dans le message
...
>>In my seemingly unending quest to find an ancestor, Joseph CHAMPAGNE--
>>who married Francoise DAVIAU around 1810-20 and whose son,
>>Joseph, married Therese HAMELIN dit RICHELIEU in Montreal in 1838--I've
>>come across a Louis LEFOUREUR dit CHAMPAGNE, who was an architect in
>>Montreal in the 1780s. I'm wondering whether he might be a relative.
>>(I found Joseph CHAMPAGNE in the 1825 Montreal (St-Laurent) census, with
>>several children.) But in all of my searchings, I've found no other
>>"LEFOUREUR" families.

Pierre LEFOUREUR (Jerome, Louise RICHARD or RICHER)
Anne-Celeste DESFORGES (Jean, Marguerite VERDON)
Montreal (ND) 1718-09-05
On his marriage contract (Raimbault, 1718-09-04) he is named FOUREUR dit
CHAMPAGNE from the parish St-Jacques eveche de Reims, and she is named
DESFORGES dit Saint-Maurice
-----------------------------------------------------
Pierre FOUREUR dit CHAMPGNE master carpenter (Pierre FOUREUR dit CHAMPAGNE
locksmith, Anne-Celeste DESFORGES) and Catherine GARTIN (Guertin) (Pierre
GUERTIN, Angelique BOURRY)
Notary SIMONET, 1744-11-08
------------------------------------------------------------

Roland Grenier
>
>Hi. I couldn't find your Champagne/Daviau marriage in the Loiselle Index
but
>I did find this (which you probably already have):
>
>Joseph Champagne (Jos. & Francoise Daviau)
>m. 25 Jun 1838 N.D. Montreal
>Therese Hamelin-Richelieu (Fran. & Therese Larocque-Losier)
>
>In the index, for every surname they list the associated "dit" names.
There
>were over a dozen for Champagne, but surprisingly no mention of Lefoureur.
>Hope I'm not making things even more confusing. Annie
>
>Annie ()
>
>***researching HOWARD, SAYER, NOCKALL (and var), LAFLIN,
>ARTTON (and var), SPADEN, ROUGHT, EDWARDS,
>STEWARDSON, COTTRELL, PLAYFORD, & NORMAN > all Norfolk :::::
plus...STEPHENSON
>> Kent ****
>
>

This thread: