GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2002-07 > 1027287155


From: (VON HAMRICK)
Subject: Re: [DNA] Ancestry/Relative Genetics DNA test: incomplete,inaccurate?
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2002 17:38:41 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: "DONALD MILLIGAN" <donmilligan22@msn.com>'s message of Sun, 21 Jul 2002 14:26:02 -0700


--WebTV-Mail-18753-1510
Content-Type: Text/Plain; Charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit

I did not have this kind of problem with Family Tree DNA. In fact, I am
quite pleased with their service. I paid for 25 markers and got 25
scores.

Von Hamrick


--WebTV-Mail-18753-1510
Content-Disposition: Inline
Content-Type: Message/RFC822
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit

Received: from smtpin-2101.public.lawson.webtv.net (209.240.213.111) by
storefull-2137.public.lawson.webtv.net with WTV-SMTP; Sun, 21 Jul
2002 14:28:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists5.rootsweb.com (lists5.rootsweb.com [207.40.200.41]) by
smtpin-2101.public.lawson.webtv.net (WebTV_Postfix+sws) with ESMTP
id E0958FE23 for <>; Sun, 21 Jul 2002 14:28:19
-0700 (PDT)
Received: (from ) by lists5.rootsweb.com (8.12.4/8.12.4) id
g6LLM2QZ001780; Sun, 21 Jul 2002 15:22:02 -0600
Resent-Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2002 15:22:02 -0600
X-Original-Sender: Sun Jul 21 15:22:01 2002
X-Originating-IP: [63.228.106.193]
From: "DONALD MILLIGAN" <>
Old-To: <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Ancestry/Relative Genetics DNA test: incomplete,
inaccurate?
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2002 14:26:02 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MSN Explorer 7.02.0005.2201
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Message-ID: <>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Jul 2002 21:22:06.0562 (UTC)
FILETIME=[AA3A1420:01C230FC]
Resent-Message-ID: <>
To:
Resent-From:
Reply-To:
X-Mailing-List: <> archive/latest/6449
X-Loop:
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender:

Here! Here!

----- Original Message -----
From: Jium Skelton
Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2002 7:03 AM
To:
Subject: [DNA] Ancestry/Relative Genetics DNA test: incomplete, inaccurate?

I have emailed Relative Genetics and Ancestry.com repeatedly asking when the code letters for four of the markers will be replaced by actual numerical results, which can then be compared to databases. They will not provide even an estimate of when the "calibration" will be complete. They just say "real soon," which does not give a warm and fuzzy feeling. When one pays close to $200 for a this 24 marker test, I think they should either provide 24 marker results or a refund. I encourage all who feel as I do to write them and demand either a deadline for the results, or a full refund. This comes close to consumer fraud. We should not have to guess that "a=10, b=11" etc like it was a Captain Midnight decoder ring from old-time radio.


--WebTV-Mail-18753-1510--


This thread: