GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2003-03 > 1046550734


From: David Faux <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] DYS454 & DYS455: Different Scores from FTDNA & RG
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2003 12:32:17 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <3E60D5BB.CAB14EF3@yahoo.com>



Charles <> wrote:
I believe that FTDNA's lab at University of AZ was the
discoverer/definer of markers DYS454 and DYS455. Since they have the
most experience with the marker I am going to trust FTDNA's results Personally I think the problem is
with RG's lab calibration and protocol for testing these new markers in
their offering.

>>> Took the words right out of my mouth Charlie. I believe that RG has excellent potential to become a premier company, but have known for some time that they have had "calibration" problems (for well over a year) - and now I find that these problems still haven't been fixed.

David.





Dr. David K. Faux, 4028 Larwin Ave., Cypress, CA, 90630, USA





---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, and more

This thread: