GENEALOGY-DNA-L ArchivesArchiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2003-04 > 1051020340
From: "TONY N FRUDAKIS" <>
Subject: RE: [DNA] Biogeo Test Results
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 09:57:48 -0500
Also keep in mind that of course if your grandmother was 50% Cherokee or
Apache, but the rest of your grandparents were European, your expected
percentage of Native American would be 12.5%.
Tony Frudakis, Ph.D.
DNAPrint genomics, Inc.
From: Crystal [mailto:]
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2003 12:26 AM
Subject: Re: [DNA] Biogeo Test Results
David thanks for the reply .. I know that there is no
direct correlation from biogeo to DIB (degree of
Indian Blood)... I was just trying to figure if 14%
would be considered statistically significant or not
(doesn't seem like a large amount :) ... and I
understand it could come from any side but was asking
assuming that if it came from just one line (my
pat-gma) - would that make a difference in her
probable DIB (since supposedly our percentage would
drop with each generation). And yes I'll pursue
eliminating possible suspects :) as soon as funds
permit. sigh. They were lucky my tax refund was
burning a hole in my pocket when they reduced the
As to which tribe - Cherokee (by oral history) (have
also heard Otoe mentioned by a cousin). So in my
adventures in genealogy I've traced back to early
1800's and they are in all MO (born KY, VA, TN). Never
made it to OK. Never were on a tribal roll that I can
find so - so much for that. lol. Of course it's
possible I've made an error in logic in following the
trail and I've further to investigate but it's looking
pretty bleak. darn it :)
But I'm pretty happy that at least I've gotten some
validation via this test even if the tribes don't
recognize it. <grin>. It'll be pretty cool if they
come up with some way to identify at least some of the
tribes out of the mix.
Once again thanks for the reply.
To join Ancestry.com and access our 1.2 billion online genealogy records, go