GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2003-11 > 1067710855


From: "Malcolm Dodd" <>
Subject: RE: [DNA] DNA Accuracy
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2003 18:20:55 -0000
In-Reply-To: <130.27227c88.2cd3e6da@aol.com>


> RG called DYS460-461 GATA A7.1 and 7.2 early on. I don't know if they've
> changed the names on recent reports. Anyone know?

Yes my report 15 September has DYS461 -11 and DYS462 - 12.
But regret the test was useless, as one is prevented from searching the RG
database unless one is part of a surname study. Individuals are persona non
grata.
Malcolm


-----Original Message-----
From: [mailto:]
Sent: sexta-feira, 31 de Outubro de 2003 16:25
To:
Subject: [DNA] DNA Accuracy


As a very satisfied customer of Relative Genetics, I can report that RG now
uses marker names DYS 460 & 461. See the full list of all their 26 markers
at
the top of Table 1 in our Wingfield Family Society DNA Project URL:

<A
HREF="http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~leepreston/index.html">http:/
/freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~leepreston/index.html</A>

[And, they place the markers in numerical order!!!!!!!!!!]

Lee Preston, Wingfield Family DNA Coordinator
~~~~~~~~~
In a message dated 31-Oct-2003 6:59:34 AM Pacific Standard Time,
writes:

> RG called DYS460-461 GATA A7.1 and 7.2 early on. I don't know if they've
> changed the names on recent reports. Anyone know?



==============================
To join Ancestry.com and access our 1.2 billion online genealogy records, go
to:
http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=571&sourceid=1237



This thread: