GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

From:
Subject: Re: [DNA] Genetic Distance calculation -- which method is best
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2003 12:37:15 EST

In a message dated 11/22/03 8:58:51 AM Pacific Standard Time,
writes:

> This means fewer generations than the "normal" of 25 years, with less
> chance
> for mutations, yet we are seeing "too many" (according to present theories),
>
> suggesting non-relationship!

Do you have a specific example for us to ponder?

Ann Turner - GENEALOGY-DNA List Administrator
Search or Browse the archives, Subscribe or Unsubscribe at
http://lists.rootsweb.com/index/other/Miscellaneous/GENEALOGY-DNA.html

This thread:

• [DNA] Mutation rate and distant ancestors by "Nicholas Penington" <>
  • Re: [DNA] Mutation rate and distant ancestors by
    • Re: [DNA] Genetic Distance calculation method -- which method ismost correct? by Charles <>
      • Re: [DNA] Genetic Distance calculation method -- which method ismost correct? by
        • Re: [DNA] Genetic Distance calculation method -- which method ismost correct? by Charles <>
          • Re: [DNA] Genetic Distance calculation method -- which method is most correct? by "Earl Beaty" <>
          • Re: [DNA] Genetic Distance calculation method -- which method ismost correct? by
      • Re: [DNA] Genetic Distance calculation method -- which method is mostcorrect? by "Nicholas Penington" <>
      • [DNA] Genetic Distance calculation -- message from Bruce Walsh. He asked me to post it to the list by Charles <>
        • Re: [DNA] Genetic Distance calculation -- message from Bruce Walsh. He asked me to post it to the list by
          • Re: [DNA] Genetic Distance calculation -- which method is best by Charles <>
          • Re: [DNA] Genetic Distance calculation -- which method is best by Charles <>
      • Re: [DNA] Genetic Distance calculation -- which method is best by
      • Re: [DNA] Genetic Distance calculation -- which method is best by
      • Re: [DNA] Genetic Distance calculation -- which method is best by
        • Re: [DNA] Genetic Distance calculation - Comments re MacGregor and a further question by "Richard McGregor" <>

      • Re: [DNA] Genetic Distance calculation -- which method is best by

      • Re: [DNA] Genetic Distance calculation -- which method is best by
      • Re: [DNA] Genetic Distance calculation - Comments re MacGregor anda further question by (VON HAMRICK)
      • Re: [DNA] Genetic Distance calculation - Comments re MacGregor and a further que by
      • Re: [DNA] Genetic Distance calculation - Comments re MacGregor anda further question by (VON HAMRICK)
      • Re: [DNA] Genetic Distance calculation - Comments re MacGregor and a further ... by
  • [DNA] mutation rate and distant ancestors correction by "Nicholas Penington" <>
  • RE: [DNA] Mutation rate and distant ancestors by "Mike Harper" <>
    • Re: [DNA] Mutation rate and distant ancestors by
  • [DNA] Re:Mutation rate and distant ancestors by "Nicholas Penington" <>
    • [DNA] Marker Frequency in Population Tables by <>
      • RE: [DNA] Marker Frequency in Population Tables by "Nancy Custer" <>
        • RE: [DNA] Marker Frequency in Population Tables by <>