GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2008-12 > 1228325759


From: Vincent Vizachero <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] TRMCA for R1b1
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 12:35:59 -0500
References: <97189.86713.qm@web86605.mail.ird.yahoo.com><266A1C12-9D1C-4FDD-9C65-F9553ED34612@vizachero.com><f3f05ce80812011642n16a8d947x4a5d7e6e3b26efe7@mail.gmail.com><227F1A58-20BA-41E7-B217-2662EE48F917@vizachero.com><f3f05ce80812021100t5ada1703k2c8da35caa608cea@mail.gmail.com><8886B93F-FC29-4BBA-BD8C-186405D05A73@vizachero.com><f3f05ce80812021438v372142a4la7cb7c2020c5a866@mail.gmail.com><001401c954eb$6ddb34e0$6400a8c0@Ken1><f3f05ce80812021849t52786667t2c7e6ff16b3cf56e@mail.gmail.com><6FD19286-3B98-4527-93A0-E2F6439F927C@vizachero.com><f3f05ce80812030916v57db289cjfcf70bcf7b99d47a@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <f3f05ce80812030916v57db289cjfcf70bcf7b99d47a@mail.gmail.com>


You keep repeating this, as if it means something.

VV


On Dec 3, 2008, at 12:16 PM, Dienekes Pontikos wrote:

> The TMRCA is irrelevant, as I have already proven. Saying that the
> TMRCA "combines" with the "apparent" direction of flow amounts does
> not make it in fact "combine" except in the sense of being in the same
> sentence.


This thread: