GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2009-08 > 1249917723


From: Jennifer <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] 65/67 match, genealogical time frame? Haplogroup N1c1
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 08:22:03 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <11985d4c0908100624v43dcc8dt8be9bc4e806e3935@mail.gmail.com>


Hi,
I can get to 1692 with any Hiski-type (parish record) certainty in Ilmajoki. So maybe this is not a long enough time.

My match gets to the same time period but in Karelia.

Another frustration is that we share the same farm name in the late 1700s but in different parishes.

BR,
Jennifer

--- On Mon, 8/10/09, Rebekah Canada <> wrote:

> From: Rebekah Canada <>
> Subject: Re: [DNA] 65/67 match, genealogical time frame? Haplogroup N1c1
> To:
> Date: Monday, August 10, 2009, 6:24 AM
> Hi,
>
> It depends on generation length. (1950-1500)/25=18 If both
> of you
> manage to get back to 1500 then you just might find the
> connection.
> Where are each of you stuck?
>
> The wide geographic distance makes me think it is a more
> distant
> connection. You may want to check the registers of
> movements into and
> out of the parishes though for uncles who moved away. Thank
> goodness
> Finland has those.
>
> Regards,
> Rebekah
>
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 6:54 AM, Jennifer<>
> wrote:
> > Thanks Rebekah,
> > I think my family is pretty much the modal
> value--Ysearch is down for me at the moment.
> >
> > We do come from almost opposite parts of Finland,
> Ostrobothnia with connections to Sweden and Karelia, which I
> think shares a border with Russia.
> >
> > I think 17 generations would not be within a record
> keeping time in Finland  which began around the 1500s in
> many areas of the country.
> >
> > Thanks again,
> > Jennifer
>
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the
> subject and the body of the message





This thread: