GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2009-12 > 1260157569


From: "Lawrence Mayka" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] R-U152 and R-L21 on the European Continent
Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 21:46:09 -0600
References: <59915.56775.qm@web81103.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <06F79C98-398C-4200-8D9C-5BA976ABD233@vizachero.com><ea3bd9560912061730y581da805v54dec4a73733efee@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <ea3bd9560912061730y581da805v54dec4a73733efee@mail.gmail.com>


It's unfortunate that the Zhivotovsky camp has not yet been confronted with
Nordtvedt's interclade technique (of calculating lower and upper bounds on
the age of a haplogroup), which removes any possible argument in favor of
fudge factors.

> From: [mailto:genealogy-dna-
> ] On Behalf Of David Faux
> Now Michael Hammer has come on board,
> along with Peter Underhill some time ago, with Zhivotovsky in terms of
> dating clade ages - so multiply by 3.6 - or not.



This thread: