GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2010-11 > 1288727225


From: Charles Hollenbeck <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] US says no patents on genes
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 12:47:05 -0700
References: <AANLkTi=cHDEQR5f5ufTUr95eyOM7RayYHP_aN3JrxU6w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=cHDEQR5f5ufTUr95eyOM7RayYHP_aN3JrxU6w@mail.gmail.com>


Makes sense to me. If you didn't invent it, why should you be allowed to
patent it - particularly
if it's found in someone elses genome!

On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 11:53 AM, steven perkins <> wrote:

> >From the NY Times
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/30/business/30drug.html?_r=2
>
>
> --
> Steven C. Perkins
> http://stevencperkins.com/
> Online Journal of Genetics and Genealogy
> http://jgg-online.blogspot.com/
> Steven C. Perkins' Genealogy Page
> http://stevencperkins.com/genealogy.html
> Steven C. Perkins' Genealogy Blog
> http://scpgen.blogspot.com/
>
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
> quotes in the subject and the body of the message
>


This thread: