GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2010-11 > 1288997789


From: Doug McDonald <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] new admixture test from Ethnoancestry
Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 18:00:29 -0500
References: <AANLkTimEbZZE9NAisE8PxA_duKebyS8Ust-HXtjhbPRQ@mail.gmail.com> <4CD42217.80607@san.rr.com> <AANLkTikGHOWVj+mnMDGveyDMwuFtuh8va5eKpri9rceE@mail.gmail.com><4CD47AC0.7090609@scs.uiuc.edu>
In-Reply-To: <4CD47AC0.7090609@scs.uiuc.edu>


On 11/5/2010 4:44 PM, Doug McDonald wrote:
> On 11/5/2010 10:53 AM, Ann Turner wrote:
>> They do add some Native American populations, but a priori I wouldn't expect
>> them to refine your predictions much beyond what the standard HGDP
>> populations can do. But ... empirical results will tell the tale.
>>
>> http://www.ethnoancestry.com/TGAC_Populations
>>
>
> Where on Earth (OK, we know where the samples came from, but WHO TESTED THEM!)
> did they get the North American one???
>
>
> WHERE??????
>
>
> I've got all the rest.
>



I looked at their samples ... the main one is a plain 1-D PCA plot
with lots of populations.

But they also do "runs of heterogeniety" ... which I think **IS** unique.

But not for long! I will investigate and code!

Doug


This thread: