GENEALOGY-DNA-L ArchivesArchiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2010-11 > 1288997789
From: Doug McDonald <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] new admixture test from Ethnoancestry
Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 18:00:29 -0500
References: <AANLkTimEbZZE9NAisE8PxA_duKebyS8Ust-HXtjhbPRQ@mail.gmail.com> <4CD42217.firstname.lastname@example.org> <AANLkTikGHOWVj+mnMDGveyDMwuFtuh8va5eKpri9rceE@mail.gmail.com><4CD47AC0.email@example.com>
On 11/5/2010 4:44 PM, Doug McDonald wrote:
> On 11/5/2010 10:53 AM, Ann Turner wrote:
>> They do add some Native American populations, but a priori I wouldn't expect
>> them to refine your predictions much beyond what the standard HGDP
>> populations can do. But ... empirical results will tell the tale.
> Where on Earth (OK, we know where the samples came from, but WHO TESTED THEM!)
> did they get the North American one???
> I've got all the rest.
I looked at their samples ... the main one is a plain 1-D PCA plot
with lots of populations.
But they also do "runs of heterogeniety" ... which I think **IS** unique.
But not for long! I will investigate and code!