GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2010-11 > 1289069044


From: Didier VERNADE <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] DYS710
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 19:44:04 +0100 (CET)
References: <344613.80275.qm@web25904.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>,<4CD55D00.5010601@san.rr.com><COL118-W3AF0F4D94FF3CC8BCC328A04D0@phx.gbl><775007.92258.qm@web112405.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <775007.92258.qm@web112405.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>


Thank you to all for your answers. I agree with Gareth that the test would have a better value in a group project if a sequencing could help finding the relationship between cases.

Didier



> Gareth,
>  
> We have used it in our VICK Y-DNA Surname Project.  So far we have found the
> results support conclusions researchers have drawn from traditional genealogical
> research where there isn’t sufficient documentary evidence to prove recent
> shared ancestry in one of our branches.
>  
> Regards,
>  
> Larry
>

> 1. Have any surname projects started using DYS710 to see if it helps link/split
> their branches?
>
> Gareth
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message




This thread: