GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2010-11 > 1289414130


From: "Ken Nordtvedt" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Fw: 2010 studies shed light onR-M269'srelativelyrecenteasttowest migration
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 11:35:30 -0700
References: <201011101814.oAAIE4tr001300@mail.rootsweb.com>


Yes. That should be the consistent message: node are age estimated; snps
live anywhere between specific nodes.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Janzen" <>
To: <>
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 1:27 AM
Subject: Re: [DNA] Fw: 2010 studies shed light on
R-M269'srelativelyrecenteasttowest migration


> Dear Ken,
> Yes, that is true, but the ages of the SNPs are also bounded by the
> ages of the nodes above and below any particular SNP.
> Sincerely,
> Tim Janzen
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> [mailto:] On Behalf Of Ken Nordtvedt
> Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 1:53 PM
> To:
> Subject: Re: [DNA] Fw: 2010 studies shed light on R-M269's
> relativelyrecenteasttowest migration
>
> age estimates are for tree nodes. snp age can not be directly estimated
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
> quotes in the subject and the body of the message
>



This thread: