GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2010-11 > 1289691910


From: "Ken Nordtvedt" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] New FTDNA Project Format
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 16:45:10 -0700
References: <BFECJOAEEPCFBFFLLBGPGEFJHJAA.dna@irishtype3dna.org>


Yes, I sure wish the universe revolved around us data miners.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Irish III DNA" <>
To: <>
Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2010 4:35 PM
Subject: Re: [DNA] New FTDNA Project Format


> Ken wrote:-
> Anyone know the reason for and advantages from combining 385a and 385b,
> etc. into single data box entries in the new FTDNA Projects
> format? It does throw another obstacle in the way of transfering
> haplotypes into private excel databases.
> *************************************************
> At the time we were complaining that these markers (and DYS459, DYS464
> etc) were converting to dates when imported into Excel, FTDNA
> responded that they often had 6 or 8 markers at DYS464, for instance and
> so they were using this "new" method for storing
> multi-value markers in their database and also displaying them this way
> too. Certainly makes it harder for data-mining. Advantage
> clearly was at their end only.
>
> Dennis
>
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
> quotes in the subject and the body of the message
>



This thread: