GENEALOGY-DNA-L ArchivesArchiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2010-11 > 1289750444
From: Al Aburto <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] New FTDNA Project Format
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 08:01:26 -0800
References: <BFECJOAEEPCFBFFLLBGPGEFJHJAA.email@example.com><B0A97FB027D64C6AB00E3AEF55659BDF@julief20dec08><firstname.lastname@example.org><215A1197496C4648B69F2A2FED6FCE24@elizabethod> <AANLkTim6kuQkpcO88jv7K71eHx6+7O_EWj_f7NGHeGemail@example.com><006701cb840e$6ed061f0$c2482dae@Ken1>
I wonder if FTDNA will now start counting DYS464, and others, as one
marker now rather than 4 to 7 or more markers?
> On 11/14/2010 7:13 AM, Ken Nordtvedt wrote:
> FTDNA should have put all their project spreadsheets out in excel in the
> first place (or at least always offered it as an option) . It is a format
> and tool permitting data manipulation galore and widely possessed.
> From: "Robert Stafford"<>
>> It is just a little more trouble to convert to Excel. I did it from the
>> public pages. [[[ Just a LITTLE more trouble....? ]]]