GENEALOGY-DNA-L ArchivesArchiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2010-11 > 1289807527
From: "Brian P. Swann" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Draft Y Tree
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 07:52:07 -0000
And perhaps Thomas Krahn could then communicate with Alice Fairhurst and we
might get a consensus - as she is responsible for co-ordinating the R
Haplogroup workers on the ISOGG site.
Or are they all fully occupied with GAP 2.0 problems right now?
A case of: "Toujours la change, toujours la meme chose?"
Can someone explain to me - as I was not at Houston - where this rationale
Brian Picton Swann
[mailto:] On Behalf Of Wilcox Lisa
Sent: 15 November 2010 06:26
Subject: Re: [DNA] Draft Y tree
Yeah, the poster pretty much reflects the draft tree. The poster looks much
like the haplo tree you can follow for a given individual, i.e., with color
distinctions and actual branches. When queried, FTDNA said:
"Thank you for your email. We will be updating the Haplotree on the website
to agree with the changes. One of these will be the shifting of R1b1b2. This
should take place over the next month or so.... [H]aplogroup tree and
individual haplogroup assignments should all be converted at the same time."
Perhaps Thomas could explain this development? Yoo hoo! Thomas?