GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2010-11 > 1290265567


From: Ann Turner <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] 10 years down the line and I still don't understand
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 07:06:07 -0800
References: <4CE7BF7D.6000207@michaellonsdale.co.uk><AANLkTikfWQBg=fg3mXbF1vCvLBHHw+h5Unw52MxpCw5N@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikfWQBg=fg3mXbF1vCvLBHHw+h5Unw52MxpCw5N@mail.gmail.com>


Yes, 14 is the current nomenclature standard. DYS389-1 has two subsegments,
one of length 3 that had never been observed to vary if direct sequencing
was performed. Older nomenclatures just reported on the variable portion.

http://www.smgf.org/ychromosome/marker_details.jspx?marker=DYS389I

Ann Turner

On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 6:50 AM, John S Walden <>wrote:

> Please confirm
>
>
> > GeneTree Test taken in 2002
> > DYS 389i = 14
> > Oxford Ancestors Test taken undated but early 2001
> > DYS 389i = 11
> >
>
> I have not seen that difference before
> I would think 14 is correct
>


This thread: