GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2010-11 > 1290981728


From: "Julie Frame Falk" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] L338 for I-M253-ML ? - att Ken
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 09:02:08 +1100
References: <6B155B5582AE46499FCCF0572DD981A9@julief20dec08><004501cb8f26$d81f4bd0$c2482dae@Ken1><4CF2BE5B.7070204@sbcglobal.net><012801cb8f41$1e734c70$c2482dae@Ken1>
In-Reply-To: <012801cb8f41$1e734c70$c2482dae@Ken1>


Ken,

I hope I am following the thread correctly. Since Steve said clade ML is negative for L22, I am presuming that I should advise Ysearch s3svy to go ahead and be tested for L338. I will do this unless you advise otherwise.

Regards
Julie Frame Falk


From: Ken Nordtvedt
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2010 8:13 AM
To:
Subject: Re: [DNA] L338 for I-M253-ML ? - att Ken


And on looking at the clade again, it looks quite young.

It should be thought of as clade "ML", and not missing link.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Trangsrud" <>

>I started checking the SNP results for the I1 Project's ML group. I
> found kit 46049, with a negative L22 result.

<<I started checking the SNP results for the I1 Project's ML group. I
found kit 46049, with a negative L22 result.

On 11/28/2010 10:05 AM, Ken Nordtvedt wrote:
> Yes, s3svy belongs in I1-ML. Checking that clade out I find no snp tests at
> all. I don't even know whether it is L22+ or ancestral? Probably someone
> in the clade has taken L22 test, but I don't have result.
>
> So I'd say s3svy ought to take L338 test unless I hear from someone of the
> clade who has tested L22+ ???????>>


-------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message



This thread: