GENIRE-L ArchivesArchiver > GENIRE > 2003-03 > 1047485487
From: "Howard Beale" <>
Subject: Re: What is the meaning of the term "Scot-Irish"
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 16:11:27 -0000
References: <NMLaa.10838$wJ1.firstname.lastname@example.org> <JbMaa.18415$EN3.email@example.com> <1TMaa.210201$Zrfirstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <wsRaa.213443$Zrfirstname.lastname@example.org> <Ob7ba.32095$L1.6666@sccrnsc02> <WL8ba.220579$Zremail@example.com> <V2nba.41841$L1.8170@sccrnsc02> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <3E6F4EC1.firstname.lastname@example.org>
Renia <> wrote in message news:...
> MacRobert wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Mar 2003 17:10:30 -0000, "Sean MacLochlainn"
> > <> paused to reflect but wrote
> > anyway:
> >>Edith Gomez wrote:
> >>>I guess you aren't as smart as I even thought you were. Eadgyth is
> >>>old Anglo-Saxon for Edith as I looked it up in some old records on
> >>>the net.
> >>>Why I do believe some of you are jealous, what is wrong with being a
> >>>Bible nut. It's is the oldest book around as far as I am concerned
> >>>and has some of the oldest genealogy in the first and second books of
> >>>Chronicles. You should check it out some time, very intersting
> >>Anyone who believes Bible genealogies really is a nut.
> > Why?
> Because it is biologically impossible to go around begatting kiddies
> when you are 500 years old.
Why? At the time, humanity was in its infancy, therefore with fewer genetic
abnormalities than we would have now. Also, the clouds which would
eventually cause the flood, were protecting us from the sun's radiation,
givng far more protection than we have now.
It's still a load of old bollocks, though
"I'm as mad as hell and I'm not going to take it anymore"
|Re: What is the meaning of the term "Scot-Irish" by "Howard Beale" <>|