GUS-REEB-L Archives

Archiver > GUS-REEB > 2004-08 > 1093486628


From: Janet Burks <>
Subject: Re: [GUS-REEB] Re: DaePowell
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 21:17:30 -0500
References: <6.0.0.22.2.20040825180538.01dabd00@mail.cox-internet.com><20040826020325.75308.qmail@web81605.mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <20040826020325.75308.qmail@web81605.mail.yahoo.com>


John,
It works on my end. Thanks a bunch!!!!!
Janet

At 09:03 PM 8/25/2004, you wrote:
>On my first 6 attempts to customize the list to propend the subject line
>with the words GUS-REEB through the utility page my password seemed to be
>rejected and each time they would send me an e-mail enclosing the password
>which is the same password I used to to submit my change. Finally I have
>used the Tool page function and I am still not sure if it is working
>properly or not.
>
>John V
>
>
>Janet Burks <> wrote:
>Dae,
>I too thought this was spam as well. At least we know who you are
>now and are one of us.
>
>John, can you place the name [GusReeb] in the subject line so that it
>always shows up? I noticed the other Reeb list
>has this. This would keep us from deleting messages!
>
>Thanks,
>Janet
>
>
>At 02:56 PM 8/25/2004, you wrote:
> >In a message dated 8/25/04 12:59:32 PM Central Daylight Time,
> > writes:
> >Just to inform those who may wonder about the person who sent a post about
> >wishing he/she had included the name Reeb in Spam filter etc. I have just
> >requested he/she be removed from the list and this was just done. I do not
> >know how
> >he/she got on the list to begin with unless he/she subscribed his/her self.
> >Anyway, I apologise for the nuisance.
> >Because my message was misunderstood, let me state again -- I enjoy
> receiving
> >the REEB/RAPE messages as I am a descendant of Gus. Reeb and Anna Stroh.
> >
> >The intent my message was to INSERT [REEB] into the subject line so that all
> >the messages would NOT be removed by my spam filter.
> >
> >I, too, apologize for being such a nuisance, but please reinstate me.
> >
> >Happy Dae
>
>Always Remember: Without documentation, genealogy is mythology!

Always Remember: Without documentation, genealogy is mythology!

This thread: