PIATT-L Archives
Archiver > PIATT > 2000-09 > 0969474592
From: (ed pyeatt)
Subject: Re: [PIATT] Nathan Piatt
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 11:29:52 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: rpyeatt@excite.com's message of Wed, 20 Sep 2000 08:42:19-0700 (PDT)
Marianne -
This one took me by surprise, too.
The data I posted is all I have - no
children are given for the marriage (Nathan Pyeatt + Martha Ewing).
I don't know how much creedance
to give this one. To top it all off, I
didn't copy down the source, just
the data, so I can't go back, or direct
you to it for confirmation. Very bad
form on my part. . .
I'm not sure if this one is worth losing
too much sleep over. I thought we had pretty well worked out the line
from
Rene to us, and this thing caught my
eye - never heard about this one.
Consequenly, the posting asking for
help with this. By the way, the spelling
given is PYEATT, not PIATT, makiong
me think that this is in the southern
part of the family. Beyond this, there
doesn't seem to be any more data.
The death date given for Rachael
Tatum (1789) is before the wedding
date for Maj. Jacob + Margaret Finley
(1790), so it seems possible.
Please forgive my lack of citation.
I know this sticks out like a sore thumb,
but it is intriguing.
I'm glad you checked in on this one.
I consider you to be the keeper of the
familhy scrolls, and I feel better that
you hadn't heard about it, either.
I still need to copy out and send to
you whatI have on the TX branch, out of
AR. I'll get that off to you - next on
the list. I've redone the pedigree (I think)
chart, back to Rene1, including the generation of Jacob2 + Mary Hull,
and
their nine offspring. Then, I drew the
chart to continue through Peter6 +
Mary (Polly) Miller, Andrew7 +
Miranda Tennant, Walter8 + Lela May
Harris, Lloyd9 + Minta Roberts,
Edward10 + (m.1) Mary Miller, (m.2)
Madelyn Horsman, to our children,today.
This realignment, plus knowledge
about p.5 in the infamous Bull.14,
gives me, finally, a coherent line.
I also have Bull.9, "Early Settlers
of Cane Hill" by Ellen Earle Richardson,
which gives a pretty good account
of daily life on the developing western
frontier. I'll get this off to you, soon.
Nathan Pyeatt is a puzzler - and
may not amount to anything; but
I'd still like to know.
Thanks for your attention.
More later,
Ed
This thread:
| Re: [PIATT] Nathan Piatt by (ed pyeatt) |