PIATT-L Archives

Archiver > PIATT > 2004-11 > 1100013320


From: "Gwen" <>
Subject: Re: [PIATT] Other John PYATT's
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 09:16:08 -0600
References: <1e4.2dbe2475.2ec17e21@aol.com>


Keep posting! I am researching the John Pyott of PA and VA as a descendant
of his daughter Susannah.
Gwen
----- Original Message -----
From: <>
To: <>
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 7:57 PM
Subject: Re: [PIATT] Other John PYATT's


> Here's a vote for you to continue!!! Beth Lauer
>
> In a message dated 11/6/04 11:30:04 AM Pacific Standard Time,
> writes:
>
> > Subj: [PIATT] Other John PYATT's
> > Date: 11/6/04 11:30:04 AM Pacific Standard Time
> > From:
> > Reply-to:
> > To:
> > Sent from the Internet
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks to you, Dick. That does help. According to a number of sources,
> > John PYATT, b. 1750, the son of John PYATT and Hannah LABRUCE married
> > three times and his 3rd wife was Charlotte WITHERS. I haven't gotten
> > around to collating the information I've gathered about him yet. I
> > spent over 2 hours writing yesterday's 2 e-mails, and have quite a bit
> > yet to present. I just haven't known whether to continue to post what
> > I've found to the list.
> >
> >
> >
> > I know that information has been published about the PYATT-PYEATT
> > families in North and South Carolina. In the end, I may come to the
> > same conclusion as other researchers. But, for now at least, it seems
> > that at least two different family lines surface in the Carolina's.
> > What we've gathered from the participants in the DNA study seems to
> > support the assumption that not all PIATT-PYATT-PYEATT families in the
> > U.S. can be traced back to Rene. Past publications have intermingled
> > these Caolina families, in some cases trying to tie all to Rene in New
> > Jersey and Pennsylvania. In other cases, Rene and the New
> > Jersey-Pennsylvania PIATT's have been ignored, coupled with the
> > assumption that the Carolina PYATT lines go straight back to England.
> > My hope in presenting my short-term research findings is that, perhaps
> > by looking at the evidence with new eyes or with the evidence presented
> > in a single forum, as researchers we can sort some of these early
> > PYATT's into their appropriate family groups. It's looking to me like
> > the surname follows both patterns, i.e. to Rene &New Jersey and
> > directly to England. John PIGHT of Hilton Head Island and Georgetown,
> > SC may be the immigrant ancestor for some PYATT's, just as Rene is the
> > immigrant ancestor for others.
> >
> >
> >
> > One option that I forgot to mention regarding the disappearance of John
> > PYATT from church and land records between 1719 and 1737 is that he may
> > have returned to England to inhabit his property at North
> > Pastures-perhaps, to claim his inheritance and establish himself as the
> > owner of those properties. It could also be that I just haven't
> > searched enough for other sources that kept him in South Carolina during
> > those years.
> >
> >
> >
> > So, my question is... do I keep presenting what I have found? Are
> > others finding this boring? Should I assume that I'm the last one to
> > research all of this and just research it for my own benefit and
> > discontinue my posts?

> > What do others think? Do I continue to post or do I cease and desist?

Thanks for all of your patience!!

> > Sharolynn
> >
>
>
>
> ==== PIATT Mailing List ====
> Welcome to the PIATT mailing list from Rootsweb! Serving
> PIATT, PYATT, PYOTT, PIAT, PYEATTE, PIAT, PYAT, PIET,
> and all variations you can think of!
>
> ==============================
> Search our Immigration Records and view names from multiple ports
> ranging from 1500s - 1900s. Over 23 million records to view. Learn more:
http://www.ancestry.com/s13967/rd.ashx
>


This thread: