PIATT-L Archives

Archiver > PIATT > 2006-11 > 1163804481


From: "Marianne" <>
Subject: Re: [PIATT] George F. Piatt
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 18:01:21 -0500 (EST)


I have the marriage as:
PIATT, G. Frank and Mrs. Rozella PIATT 12 Oct 1898 This would indicate that she was a Piatt by marriage and not birth (which ties into your family history). I did not find another Piatt who was married to a 'Rozella' before 1898. But, I believe the story. MCP--- On Mon 11/06, &lt; &gt; wrote:
From: [mailto: ]To: : 6 Nov 2006 11:57:39 -0700Subject: Re: [PIATT] George F. PiattThis is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list.Classification: QueryMessage Board URL:http://boards.ancestry.com/mbexec/msg/rw/Z.2ACBAEB/311.1.1Message Board Post:Thankyou for replying.I posted I found him in the 1900 census, what I meant to say is that I found him in the 1910 census in Kentucky. The 1910 census has him listed as being 44 and the 1920 census has him listed as 51. So the Frank in the 1880 census would be the right age.As far as the Rozella goes, my Ggrandfather used to tell us that she was married to one of George's older brothers first. He went to Cincinnati to sell cattle and never returned. George then moved in to help her with the farm, and eventually married her and had at least four more children. How true this story is, I couldn't tell you, but my mother can remember most of them. When papaw would take u!
s
to the cemetaries, we would go to Manchester and an old cemetary behind a church up on hill(I know that really narrows it down, doesn't it) east of Manchester. It is the one where Hester (Black)Piatt is buried.Thankyou again for responding, and your time, Tara Johnson-------------------------------To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

_______________________________________________
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!

This thread: