TMG-L Archives
Archiver > TMG > 2000-01 > 0946924454
From: Lee Hoffman/KY <>
Subject: Re: TMG-L: Source Surety Values
Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2000 13:34:14 -0500
Hugh Wilding wrote:
>I'm agreeing with all of this but at the same time beginning to feel a
>little uneasy. I use surety levels thus:
>
>3 Primary/contemporary document
>2 Good secondary source
>1 Unproven/dubious secondary source
>0 Hearsay/assumption
>- Known to be erroneous
This is close to what I use except that I include hearsay (at least what I
might consider the more reliable kind -- what ever that is <g>) in the 1
level. I restrict the 0 level for pure assumptions, estimates, guesses,
WAGs, etc. Mostly these are my guesses, but they may be a consensus of a
number of people researching the same family.
As I said, one set of definition to a customer -- all different. <g>
----------
Lee Hoffman/KY
E-mail:
My website: <http://www.users.mis.net/~lhoffman>
--------------
A user of the best genealogy program, The Master Genealogist (TMG)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
TMG-L The Internet Mailing List for The Master Genealogist
To unsubscribe: Send an e-mail to with 'UNSUBSCRIBE TMG-L'
or... if you get the digest version: 'UNSUBSCRIBE TMG-L-DIGEST'
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This thread:
| Re: TMG-L: Source Surety Values by Lee Hoffman/KY <> |