TMG-L Archives

Archiver > TMG > 2000-03 > 0951919762


From: bob gillis <>
Subject: Re: TMG-L: verifying a date 1665/66 or 1666/67
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2000 09:09:22 -0500


I checked the TMGW calendar for 1752 and September contains 30 days
where it should have had only 19. That is assuming it is tied into the
1752 British calandar change. It looks like the TMGW calendar is the
Gregorian worked back wards and does not take into account the J-G
conversion.

It would be best for Norb to go back and find the original record that
probably says 19 11m 1664 or whatever year.

Norb should review what sources have what date. If the IGI or AF has
one date and other soures the other date, I would take the other date.

bob gillis

Bud Dorr wrote:
>
> None. The two closest years are 1664 and 1669. On the Person View in TMG go to
> Tools, Calendar and plug in the month and year.
>
> Norb Bankert wrote:
> >
> > I may be stretching it a little by posting this question here but I'm hoping
> > to tap into the superior intelligence of this group.
> >
> > I have an ancestor who was born in Connecticut on January 19, either 1665/66
> > or 1666/67. The later date is most oftened cited but the earlier date shows
> > up enough to cast some doubt.
> > As good luck would have it, documentation shows that she was born on
> > SATURDAY, 19 January 65/66 or 66/67.
> > Would anyone know where I might find in which one of these years January
> > 19'th came on a Saturday?
>


- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
TMG-L The Internet Mailing List for The Master Genealogist
To unsubscribe: Send an e-mail to with 'UNSUBSCRIBE TMG-L'
or... if you get the digest version: 'UNSUBSCRIBE TMG-L-DIGEST'
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

This thread: