TMG-L Archives
Archiver > TMG > 2000-03 > 0951943164
From: "John Ketcham" <>
Subject: RE: TMG-L: verifying a date 1665/66 or 1666/67
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2000 15:39:24 -0500
>
> I checked the TMGW calendar for 1752 and September contains 30 days
> where it should have had only 19. That is assuming it is tied into the
> 1752 British calandar change. It looks like the TMGW calendar is the
> Gregorian worked back wards and does not take into account the J-G
> conversion.
The TMG v4.x Reference Manual states that the calendar makes no adjustments
for calendar changes within any individual country (p. 25). I assume this
follows TMG's philosophy of not making assumptions for the user. In
addition, deleting September 3-13, 1752 would make the calendar inaccurate
for some international users. On a related note, even in British America it
isn't safe to assume that all dates before September 2, 1752 are old style
(Julian calendar). While Parliament made the Gregorian calendar effective
in 1752 within Great Britain and its colonies, immigrants to America from
countries that had already adopted the Gregorian calendar sometimes used new
style dates before 1752. See Mark M. Smith, "Culture, Commerce, and
Calendar Reform in Colonial America," The William and Mary Quarterly, 3rd
ser., 55 (1998): 557-584.
John Ketcham
Fort Wayne, Indiana
Ketcham Genealogy (http://fp-www.wwnet.com/~jketcham)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
TMG-L The Internet Mailing List for The Master Genealogist
To unsubscribe: Send an e-mail to with 'UNSUBSCRIBE TMG-L'
or... if you get the digest version: 'UNSUBSCRIBE TMG-L-DIGEST'
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This thread:
| RE: TMG-L: verifying a date 1665/66 or 1666/67 by "John Ketcham" <> |