TMG-L Archives
Archiver > TMG > 2000-03 > 0952174779
From: Lee Hoffman/KY <>
Subject: Re: TMG-L: New/Old Style v Gregorian/Julian
Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2000 07:59:39 -0500
Chris Andrle wrote:
>> 4-Feb-1659/60 is precise (being pedantic you might want to write Old Style
>> after it!)
>
>I find this very interesting but now I'm confused. How does the double year
>date make this date precise? What indicates Old Style or New Style? I
>thought that double year dates were only used to make dates that fell
>between January 1st and March 25th unambiguous in relation to the start of
>the year and had nothing to do with Old Style or New Style.
An imprecise date would be 4 Feb 1659 or 4 Feb 1660. With 4 Feb 1659/60,
one knows exactly which year is meant.
----------
Lee Hoffman/KY
E-mail:
TMG Tips: <http://www.tmgtips.com>
My website: <http://www.tmgtips.com/lhoffman>
--------------
A user of the best genealogy program, The Master Genealogist (TMG)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
TMG-L The Internet Mailing List for The Master Genealogist
To unsubscribe: Send an e-mail to with 'UNSUBSCRIBE TMG-L'
or... if you get the digest version: 'UNSUBSCRIBE TMG-L-DIGEST'
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This thread:
| Re: TMG-L: New/Old Style v Gregorian/Julian by Lee Hoffman/KY <> |