TMG-L Archives

Archiver > TMG > 2000-08 > 0965185666


From: "Ron Chenier" <>
Subject: Re: [TMG] Descendants Report Sentencing
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2000 23:07:46 -0400
References: <3.0.32.20000801125300.0074a0fc@pop.multipro.com>


Thanks Paul,

Guess I will wait to see what 4.0a does in this case. Unless some else has any
ideas on this.
Wonder if others who migrated to TMG from UFT have this similar problem.

Ron


----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul E. Lawrence" <>
To: <>
Sent: 1-Aug-00 1:53 PM
Subject: Re: [TMG] Descendants Report Sentencing


> This may be related to the way 4.0 imported the data from UFT. I don't
> believe this problem exists with data imported with 4.0a.
>
> Paul
>
>
> At 01:32 PM 8/1/2000 -0400, you wrote:
> >Paul,
> >
> >Now having read the manual more indept, I wonder why this particular problem
> >exists in the first place. As Don Fehr mentions in another message the
> reports
> >should quote he/she for the second and subsequent sentences for the same
> person.
> >This is so stated on page 266 in the explanation of [P] Variable Event Tag.
> >So why should I have to modify the sentence structure?
> >Would this have anything to do with the famous semi-colon problem?
> >
> >Can Bob Velke please explain this?
> >
> >And Paul, yes I have converted my data from UFT to TMG, v4. (But I still
> use UFT
> >also). Anxiously awating v4a.
> >
> >Ron
> >
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Paul E. Lawrence" <>
> >To: <>
> >Sent: 1-Aug-00 12:14 PM
> >Subject: Re: [TMG] Descendants Report Sentencing
> >
> >
> >> Ron:
> >>
> >> I assume you are using 4.0. Look on page 266 of the manual. You would
> >> replace the [P] with [PF]. Have you already converted your UFT data to
> >> TMG? The 4.0a release will give you a much cleaner import of UFT data.
> >>
> >> Paul
> >>
> >> At 11:48 AM 8/1/2000 -0400, you wrote:
> >> >Myrnice
> >> >
> >> >Would I go to the Tag Type Definition Screen to do the modification of the
> >> >sentence?
> >> >In the "Sentence" field what would I have to do? Does it have something
> to do
> >> >with "[P]" ?
> >> >Would changing it here change all occurences?
> >> >
> >> >Ron
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> Ron
> >> >>
> >> >> If you change the tag sentences to display just the first name
> instead of
> >> >> the full name this will go away. If you are using the default sentences,
> >> you
> >> >> can change all off the output at one place and it will change all
> >> >> occurences.
> >> >>
> >> >> Myrnice
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> Paul E. Lawrence
> >>
> >> Lawrence Genealogy: http://users.multipro.com/lawrpaul
> >> Includes allied surnames of Bumpass, Byerly, Daughtrey, Ford (Faure),
> >> Harper, Harr, Wilhite/Wilhoit. Also researching Burnett, Daniel, McMurry,
> >> Hill, Bondurant, Stansbury, and Rose, and others.
> >>
> >> Roots User Group of Arlington, VA: http://www.rootsusers.org/
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> Paul E. Lawrence
>
> Lawrence Genealogy: http://users.multipro.com/lawrpaul
> Includes allied surnames of Bumpass, Byerly, Daughtrey, Ford (Faure),
> Harper, Harr, Wilhite/Wilhoit. Also researching Burnett, Daniel, McMurry,
> Hill, Bondurant, Stansbury, and Rose, and others.
>
> Roots User Group of Arlington, VA: http://www.rootsusers.org/
>

This thread: