TMG-L Archives
Archiver > TMG > 2000-10 > 0970498450
From: bob gillis <>
Subject: Re: [TMG] Place Levels and "villages"
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 10:54:10 -0400
References: <3.0.5.32.20000930191147.007d1ba0@m2.sprynet.com> <B0000424708@millenni-iom342.millennium20.com> <3.0.5.32.20000929202236.007d0930@m2.sprynet.com> <2d.1872497.2705f6a5@cs.com> <3.0.5.32.20001001085257.007d0440@m2.sprynet.com> <3.0.5.32.20001001204105.007d0840@m2.sprynet.com>
Darrell A. Martin wrote:
>
> However, a Vermont town is NOT a municipality. The forms
> of government are different.
>
The definition of municipality that I am using is " a city, town, etc.
having its own incorporated government".
> >I believe there are no incorporated villages in MA and VT. If a town
> >divides the new part is another town or city.
>
> In Vermont, a village may just be a more or less
> formally recognized "place," like a crossroads with
> enough buildings to be named; or it may indeed be
> incorporated." snip
As I said, you should know something about a states civil organization
and I don't know VT. If you want complexity, PA has townships, boroughs
and 1st, 2nd and 3rd class cities, that I know of. NJ has town,
townships, villages, boroughs and cities.
bob gillis
This thread:
| Re: [TMG] Place Levels and "villages" by bob gillis <> |