TMG-L Archives

From:
Subject: Re: [TMG] Re: Fat-32 (WAS Scanned picture list)
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2001 12:26:39 EST

In a message dated 12/31/00 10:51:06 PM Central Standard Time,
writes:

<< Say what? I've been using FAT-32 for a couple of years now, with TMG 3.5,
4.0, and now 4.0c, with no problems. I queried the list about potential
problems before converting, and was assured there would be none. I think
you're confusing a 16-bit O/S (which TMG still employs, in the form of
FoxPro) with a 16-bit file storage system.

Chris >>
Thanks Chris. I too have FAT-32, and thought maybe I was having problems and
didn't know it.<G> Teresa

This thread:

• Re: [TMG] Re: Fat-32 (WAS Scanned picture list) by