TMG-L Archives

Archiver > TMG > 2001-03 > 0983455950


From:
Subject: Re: [TMG] Lackey vs. Mills preferences
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 09:12:30 EST


DeAnna,

I have used Lackey for years and have no intention to ever change. I make my
source footnotes, etc., custom, however. This works nicely for me. I agree
with Lackey in that there are only *so* many source *types*. It is possible
to use Lackey for source types and still use the footnote, endnote, and
bibliographic examples of Mills. I sort of use a combination of everything.
<g>

Frankie Liles


<< I'm using Lackey mainly because I've used Cite Your Sources for manual work
before aquiring TMG. Is it *really* worth it for me to get Evidence! and
change my citation style? Or will Lackey do perfectly well for most cases?
Especially interested in opinions from folks that have used Lackey for a
while and may or may not have decided to change to Mills. >>

This thread: