TMG-L Archives
Archiver > TMG > 2001-03 > 0983651543
From: Bob Velke <>
Subject: Re: [TMG] Relationship Tags (was Re: C'mon Bob ...)
Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2001 15:32:23 -0500
In-Reply-To: <aa.11dfb358.27d2a270@aol.com>
>To my way of thinking the only relationships that should be capable of being
>recorded in blood relationship tags *are* blood relationships...
I understand. But you'll understand that, "I don't think that anyone
should be _allowed_ to interpret their data differently than I would" is
not a popular concept <g>.
>particularly with the advent of Roles which are now available.
You could always record the roles of event participants - but now you can
do it in a more structured way.
-Bob
This thread:
| Re: [TMG] Relationship Tags (was Re: C'mon Bob ...) by Bob Velke <> |