TMG-L Archives
Archiver > TMG > 2001-09 > 0999403414
From: Linda Lawhon <>
Subject: Re: [TMG] GEDCOM to WorldConnect prob
Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2001 23:03:34 -0500
References: <4.3.2.7.2.20010901190327.00adfc60@pop3.airmail.net><003501c13340$b02b5d40$b66b323f@custom><4.2.0.58.20010830222608.00a495a0@mail><00b901c1332f$52ae03e0$2f2c0441@bvrtn1.or.home.com>
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20010902111953.00ba5b60@mail.internode.on.net>
Hi Robin,
I think it must have to do with TMG outputting marriage partners in
the order that their data was entered. I do wish some things could
just be easy. Tis not like I am asking for a perfect Register report
with all sources cited! Egads! I just want the begats.
> Also, look at the ID numbers for each partner. I think that one
way I fixed this was to renumber the Spice so that their ID# were in
the correct date sequence.<
Don't think that will fix the problem.
Marriage 1 Talitha Jane Love b: 11 DEC 1850 in McDonald County, Missouri
·Married: 27 NOV 1870 in Newton Co., Missouri
Marriage 2 Frances Arbell Griffin b: 17 SEP 1866 in Pike County,
Arkansas
·Married: 12 DEC 1886 in Pike County, Arkansas
Marriage 3 Sarah L. Davidson b: 27 JAN 1840
·Married: 02 JAN 1856
Marriage 4 Mary E. Barnes
·Married: 12 FEB 1884
Sarah is #213
Talitha is #214
Frances is # 215
Mary is # 1395 (A marriage no one knew about until a bible was
located recently.)
If the problem could be fixed with the ID # -- then the above
marriages should have been in order. In any case, this is the pits.
There is no way one could tell there is this problem unless one did
create a GEDCOM and then read each and every mulitple marriage family.
> This certainly was a bug in an earlier version - has it crept back in.
I guess I will just have to put a statement in every GEDCOM I share
that the material may not be in proper order due some some quirk.
Thanks for the reply.
Linda
This thread: