TMG-L Archives

Archiver > TMG > 2001-12 > 1007374897


From: "Carol Simpson" <>
Subject: Re: [TMG] Inconsistency using formatting codes
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 01:21:37 -0900
References: <3C0A8434.21705.C281EC@localhost> <001701c17bae$45be2620$11c3fea9@oemcomputer>


I have never tried this, but it is something that has been discussed here before. It is true that you can only go 34 generations, then it no longer works right. I am sure that Lee will have a ingenious suggestion. :-)

Carol Simpson
Homer, Alaska


----- Original Message -----
From: Bill Kullman
To:
Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2001 6:21 PM
Subject: Re: [TMG] Inconsistency using formatting codes



----- Original Message -----
From: Roger N. Whiting <>
To: <>
Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2001 5:42 PM
Subject: Re: [TMG] Inconsistency using formatting codes


> Hats off to Paul Lawrence addressing a problem that many of us have been
> trying to solve in developing consistent and reliable report formats.
>
I hate to add fuel to the fire....but on Thankgiving, (for my visiting
daughter) I tried to run an ancestor ahnentafel chart, standard
columnar....asking for 35 generations, which I assumed would be pretty
straightforward.

It was...to generation 34, afterwhich the report turned to gobbledygook....
still printing people, no AT #'s for about 4 or 5 pages. Tried that a couple
times, looking for what might trigger the collapse of data.... then changed
starting person...and had the same experience...so, I don't think it's the
data, it must be the program.

Anyone else ever run into this...?

Curious in Oregon
Bill Kullman
on the old oregon trail


==== TMG Mailing List ====
.

This thread: