TMG-L Archives
Archiver > TMG > 2001-12 > 1007405627
From: "Paul E. Lawrence" <>
Subject: Re: [TMG] Inconsistency using formatting codes
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2001 12:53:47 -0600
References: <3C0A8434.21705.C281EC@localhost><001701c17bae$45be2620$11c3fea9@oemcomputer><004701c17be4$4b6429e0$a6672c0c@carolsimpson>
In-Reply-To: <004101c17c20$53e07060$11c3fea9@oemcomputer>
Only in Ancestral reports. I've run descendant journals with more. Also the
limitation doesn't seem to affect the pedigree chart. I've run a pedigree
chart of over 100 generations (over 1,000 pages)...
At 09:31 AM 12/3/2001 -0800, you wrote:
>Does this mean that we're limited in all reports to 34 gen's? (anybody)
>
>still curious in Oregon
>bill kullman
Paul E. Lawrence
My Lawrence Genealogy web page has moved to the following URL:
http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~lawrpaul/index.htm
Includes allied surnames of Bumpass, Byerly, Daughtrey, Ford (Faure),
Harper, Harr, Wilhite/Wilhoit. Also researching Burnett, Daniel, McMurry,
Hardy, Hill, Bondurant, Stansbury, Towne, Kincaid, and Rose, and others.
User of The Master Genealogist (TMG) http://www.whollygenes.com/index.htm
Member of the Roots User Group of Arlington, VA: http://www.rootsusers.org/
This thread:
| Re: [TMG] Inconsistency using formatting codes by "Paul E. Lawrence" <> |