TMG-L Archives

Archiver > TMG > 2002-01 > 1012534739


From: Martha Grenzeback <>
Subject: Re: [TMG] Obits the Right way?
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 21:38:59 -0600
In-Reply-To: <30.217f1524.298ade86@aol.com>


Well, the reason is--I didn't think of it! That's a good idea, thanks!

Best wishes,
Martha Grenzeback


At 12:53 PM 31-01-2002 -0500, wrote:


>Martha,
>
>Was there some reason you didn't want to put the name of the newspaper in the
>detail section of the location?
>
>It seems to me by putting the name in the location that you can easily get a
>report of all the people that have obits/articles in that paper.
>
>I like using the PG variable and am considering change my sentence.
>Thanks
>Patt Ricketts
>
>In a message dated 1/29/2002 9:31:38 PM Pacific Standard Time,
> writes:
>
>
> > THEN--using an idea from someone on this list (can't remember who--I think
> > a couple of people, and thanks again!), I ALSO have an OBIT tag, where the
> > sentence is: An obituary for [PG] was published <[M1]> <[D]> <[L]>. <It
> > read: [M2]> The first part of the memo is "in [the name of the
> > newspaper]"; the second part (separated from the first in the memo
> field by
> >
> > double pips ||) is a transcription of the obituary itself.


This thread: