TMG-L Archives

From: "Astrid Kranzbuhler" <>
Subject: Assumption, was Re: [TMG] Now You See It, Thanks
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2002 04:40:08 +1100
References: <4.3.2.7.2.20020201082423.00ad6650@pop.nycap.rr.com>

Hi Joe,
actually, I have both.

'Assumption' I use for data I ... well ... assume <g>; e.g. I have a few cases where a person remarried while the1st spouse was living and I assume they got divorced but have no documentation (yet).

'Personal Knowledge' I use for data I know for (fairly) certain without documentation, e.g. where I was personally present at the event.

Astrid


Joe wrote:
> I realize that your comment is facetious, but there is a source category
> called "personal knowledge" - you might use that and make the Informant
> "Assumption", and explain your reasoning in your CD.
>
> Joe

This thread:

• [TMG] Now You See It, Thanks by
  • Re: [TMG] Now You See It, Thanks by Joe Makowiec <>

    • Assumption, was Re: [TMG] Now You See It, Thanks by "Astrid Kranzbuhler" <>

  • Re: [TMG] Now You See It, Thanks by Terry Reigel <>
  • Re: [TMG] Now You See It, Thanks by Lee Hoffman <>