TMG-L Archives

Archiver > TMG > 2002-04 > 1017840672


From: Lee Hoffman <>
Subject: Re: [TMG] Assist Request
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 08:31:12 -0500
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020402085230.00b18550@mail.comcast.net>
In-Reply-To: <3CAAFA5B.F330F929@bellatlantic.net>


bob gillis wrote:
>Damon Floyd wrote:
> >
> > I made four new Tags for Deeds and Land Records.
> >
> > Deeds
> > [:CR:][:TAB:]<On [D]> <[L]> [M]
> >
> > Deed_Buy
> > [:CR:][:TAB:]<On [D]> <[L]>, <[M]>
> >
> > Deed_Sell
> > [:CR:][:TAB:]<On [D]> <[L]>, [M]
> >
> > Deed_Original
> > [:CR:][:TAB:][P1F] was an Original Land Purchaser <[D]> <[L]> of
> > the [M]
> >
>Damon, don't confuse a new user with formatting codes: [:CR:]= carriage
>return and [:TAB:] = tab.
>
>But I don't understand how you use these tag sentences. You have no
>people in them and except for label the sentence structure is the same.

Apparently Damon places all the information except the Date and Location
information in the Memo field in a free-form manner. It is not what I
would do, but it would work. For Frank's information, if I were to
create/use these tags I would probably have Tag Sentences something like:

Deeds
<On [D]> <[L]>, [P] <|and [PO] > [M]

Deed_Buy
<On [D]> <[L]>, [P] <|and [PO]> bought [M]

Deed_Sell
<On [D]> <[L]>, [P] <|and [PO]> sold [M]

Deed_Original (I'd probably call it Deed_Grant or Deed_Patent)
<On [D]> <[L]>, [P] <|and [PO]> received a grant for <[M]>
or
<On [D]> <[L]>, [P] <|and [PO]> received a patent for <[M]>

I probably would not include the [:CR:] or [:TAB:] Codes in the default
Sentences as I would adjust the individual Sentences as I needed them.


This thread: