TMG-L Archives

Archiver > TMG > 2002-06 > 1022989283


From: Glee Crocker <>
Subject: RE: [TMG] Validate File Integrity
Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2002 22:41:23 -0500
In-Reply-To: <002701c209e5$e3522f10$6401a8c0@charliexi>


-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Byram [mailto:]
Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 10:31 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [TMG] Opinions please

Darell said:

> My suggestion is to set aside the documents or notes that you used
to do
> your data entry in v.5, for possible use in re-entry in v.4 if it
came to
> that. I doubt that it will, but if there are any serious bugs (for
example,
> if the Validate File Integrity bug report turns out to be correct
and
> applies to a lot of situations) we might all be re-importing.

For some perspective.

1) No one is required to use Validate File Integrity.
2) The only person that has reported a data issue is Laura and it's
not clear is it's a display issue or otherwise. The next update should
cover this.
3) Validate File Integrity has now been run by dozens of people on
dozens of projects hundreds of times with no issue. Some people get
erroneous 'possible problems fixed' messages. Optimize fixes that for
the most part.
4) If you backup before running this check, you can always restore the
backup.

I personally see no reason not to be doing real work using 5.01.000.

Jim
____________________________________________________________________________
_________________________
Jim:
How do we know when the 'possible problems fixed' message is in error? Is
there a log generated of what errors were corrected and a way to determine
if those 'errors' were valid?



==== TMG Mailing List ====
Please remove any "Reply-To:" address in your e-mail program. Including a
"Reply-To:" prevents others from benefiting from replies to your questions.

This thread: