TMG-L Archives

Archiver > TMG > 2002-06 > 1023079525


From: Nicholette Hart <>
Subject: RE: [TMG] Place of death
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2002 16:45:25 +1200


Recording only from these sources could also be inaccurate. My father has a
certified birth certificate that says he is several years younger than he
is. Naturally he prefers this :).

I record everything I find, making use of comments and sureties as to how
much validity I place on the information. Even unreliable sources has
proved useful in later times for finding additional info or sorting out
conflicting information.

Nikki

-----Original Message-----
From:Frank Peters [SMTP:]
Sent:Monday, June 03, 2002 4:09 PM
To:
Subject:Re: [TMG] Place of death

On Sun, 2 Jun 2002, Cliff Soderback wrote:

> > I have to disagree. My grandmother has only one record of her birth.
Her
> > aunts Bible. I saw it only once in my lifetime and sourced it in TMG.
If
> I
> > had not, and did not pass that information down, no one would have any
> proof
> > that she was born on that date. Just because a record isn't public
> knowledge
> > doesn't mean we shouldn't use it. What if you sourced a deed, and then
> the
> > courthouse burned down, would you remove that source?
> > Teresa Ghee Elliott

...

> To me, it is a waste of time to source something that no one can
> verify, in legal terms it is hearsay.

This makes no real sense to me. Should she forget that she found any
indication of her grandmother's birth data? Or record it but make no note
of where she found it?

Genealogical research is more analogous to an investigation than a trial.
Criminal investigators record hearsay evidence all of the time...because
it may provide clues (or merely insights) that lead to other, better,
evidence that can then be used in a trial.

Frank Peters
Starkville, Mississippi


==== TMG Mailing List ====
To un-subscribe from TMG-L (mail mode), send a message to
<> with just the word "unsubscribe" (no quotes)in
the text and turn off your signature.

This thread: