TMG-L Archives

Archiver > TMG > 2002-07 > 1025548916


From: "jelong" <>
Subject: Re: [TMG] 5.02 relationship tags
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 11:41:56 -0700
References: <4.3.2.7.2.20020701105047.00de03f0@pop.nycap.rr.com>


I would leave it like it is. If I use an adopted or step tag for the child I
know what the "parents" are.
I just don't see the need.
There could be both natural and step and/or adopted children for the
parents.

Sounds confusing
Jo


> At 10:23 AM 7-1-2002 -0400, wrote:
> >Since it seems that everyone who responded to my post about having the
> >relationship tag print where MOTHER and FATHER are now, was in agreement
> >that we would like this feature, how do we go about seeing if it in one
> >Bob can implement.
>
>
>


This thread: