TMG-L Archives

Archiver > TMG > 2002-07 > 1025703757


From: Tom Clough <>
Subject: Re: [TMG] 5.02 relationship tags
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 06:42:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <200207031319.g63DJDLB022143@lists5.rootsweb.com>


Steven

Is there a way to do that? To the best of my
knowledge, there is currenly no way to have
distinctive wording for different "flavors" of the
relationship tags. I would very much like to see that
capability added. If it does already exist, could you
explain how to change them.

Tom

> Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 06:48:48 -0500
> From:
> To:
> Subject: Re: [TMG] 5.02 relationship tags
>
> Tom,
> Why not simply add "probably" to the default
> sentence for any
> -CAN Tag? Add "step-" or "adopted" where desired.
> You have complete
> control of the wording for every Tag type.
> StevenC
> =========
> On Tue, 2 Jul 2002 11:41:24 -0700 (PDT) Tom Clough
> <>
> writes:
> > Add my vote to those who would like to see it
> changed. I would even
> like it to go one step further and have sentences
> associated with the
> various catagories so that a report could say
> something like "John Smith
> was probably the son of Joe Smith..." for a -CAN
> tag. That makes it clear
> to others the this relationship is not proven.
> >
> > Tom

=====
Thomas Clough


http://www.tomclough.com/SS

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free
http://sbc.yahoo.com

This thread: