TMG-L Archives
Archiver > TMG > 2002-08 > 1028242634
From: "Lew" <>
Subject: Re: [TMG] Source standards -- was Mills Source for Memorial?
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 18:53:50 -0700
References: <167.1198849e.2a7aa89a@cs.com> <001901c2398e$cf2bf920$14d0d043@oemcomputer> <010501c239a9$c231e020$557f0050@caroline>
----- Original Message -----
From: "Caroline Gurney" <>
To: <>
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 3:21 PM
Subject: Re: [TMG] Source standards -- was Mills Source for Memorial?
> Lew wrote:
>
> > Most people think that Mills is gospel. At least that is what I am
> > hearing.
>
> Not this side of the pond. We manage just fine without either Mills or
> Lackey.
>
> Caroline Gurney
> Portsmouth, UK
>
>
>
> ==== TMG Mailing List ====
> Please remove any "Reply-To:" address in your e-mail program. Including a
"Reply-To:" prevents others from benefiting from replies to your questions.
>
=======================================
Caroline,
And who is your leader? Is it to each his own or what?
Lew
This thread:
| Re: [TMG] Source standards -- was Mills Source for Memorial? by "Lew" <> |