TMG-L Archives

Archiver > TMG > 2002-10 > 1033562978


From:
Subject: Re: [TMG] All at once Family NAME Change?
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 08:49:38 EDT


In a message dated 10/2/2002 1:03:19 AM Central Standard Time,
writes:


> Otherwise, what is the point of saying ...
> He was also known as Joseph Hindley.
> He was also known as Joseph Hendley.
> He was also known as Joseph Hindly.
> He was also known as Joseph Hendly.
> He was also known as Joseph Hanley.
> He was also known as Joseph Henley.
> He was also known as Joseph Hainly.
>

Stuart,
I just suppress the sentences for Name tags. That way the above doesn't
print. I agree it is silly. If I were going to print my name tags, I would
change the sentences so that they read."On the 1880 census, he was listed as
Joseph Hainly." I feel that is redundant, since the next sentence would be
"Joseph Hainly was enumerated on the 1880 census 23 Jun 1880, Nebraska."
Teresa Ghee Elliott


This thread: