TMG-L Archives

Archiver > TMG > 2002-12 > 1038795474


From: "James P. Colgate" <>
Subject: Re: [TMG] setting up a married (second) tag for the first time
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 21:17:54 -0500
References: <001101c28f61$eee3c760$f2bb3a41@oemcomputer> <3DD99049.5040700@reigelridge.com> <006d01c28f7c$432f86a0$f2bb3a41@oemcomputer> <002001c29564$df72b4e0$b1e8d73f@oemcomputer> <001101c2956d$fdd95d90$d7b9fea9@MYRNICE> <008701c29596$ce6bcec0$b1e8d73f@oemcomputer> <001001c295a7$ea9e5fc0$d7b9fea9@MYRNICE>


----- Original Message -----
From: "myrnice" <>
> James
>> Adding the divorced data to the tag will enhance the information
available
> but the dates are a bit much. I guess if you have multiple spouses at the
> same time, you should create a special sentence for that occasional
> occurrence. <snip> As to including the information in future spouses I
> think this is overkill. Even the divorce date in future spouses reports is
a
> bit much as they should already show on the divorced spouses report.

Myrnice,

Thanks for your suggestions. You're right that if I had sentences to do all
I say, then I'd be saying too much at once, and it would end up just
confusing my readers. It helps to hear it from someone else that I should
take a step back and actually look at what one's actually producing! Thanks
again,
James Colgate


This thread: