TMG-L Archives
Archiver > TMG > 2003-01 > 1041469847
From: "Stuart Armstrong" <>
Subject: RE: [TMG] General tags or VERY specific tags?
Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2003 18:10:47 -0700
References: <002b01c2b1f9$63b207a0$6eb52244@khnlic0umhcfd>
In-Reply-To: <002b01c2b1f9$63b207a0$6eb52244@khnlic0umhcfd>
Linda,
OK, go ahead and be persnickity! <Very Big Grin>. But I agree: the Modifier War was lost a long time ago, along with the War over sort order of modified dates in TMG, and it probably isn't worth it.
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 1/1/03, at 18:53, Linda Gaylord-Kuhn wrote:
>Hate to tell you this, Stuart, but (being persnickity as usual) I am
>going to insist that "by" and "before" are different. "By 1800" does
>include the year 1800
<snip>
>Oh, please! Don't make me go THERE. When it comes to the Modifier War,
>I'm lose. <LOL>
Stuart Armstrong
mail to:
web page: http://cgi.aros.net/~stuarta
This thread:
| RE: [TMG] General tags or VERY specific tags? by "Stuart Armstrong" <> |