TMG-L Archives
Archiver > TMG > 2003-01 > 1041533075
From: "Paul E. Lawrence" <>
Subject: Re: [TMG] General tags or VERY specific tags?
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 12:44:47 -0600
References: <3E1453E0.1080507@reigelridge.com><5.1.0.14.2.20030102100514.02194498@pop3.citlink.net>
In-Reply-To: <3E147B5A.26A42819@infoave.net>
Okay, some....majority?? <vbg>
At 11:48 AM 1/2/2003 -0600, Richard Brogger wrote:
>Don't make that so inclusive. How about saying 'some' tmgers. <g>
XXENDSXX
Paul E. Lawrence
My Lawrence Genealogy web page has moved to the following URL:
http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~lawrpaul/index.htm
Includes allied surnames of Bumpass, Byerly, Daughtrey, Ford (Faure),
Harper, Harr, Wilhite/Wilhoit. Also researching Burnett, Daniel, McMurry,
Hardy, Hill, Bondurant, Stansbury, Towne, Kincaid, and Rose, and others.
User of The Master Genealogist (TMG) http://www.whollygenes.com/index.htm
Member of the Roots User Group of Arlington, VA: http://www.rootsusers.org/
This thread:
| Re: [TMG] General tags or VERY specific tags? by "Paul E. Lawrence" <> |