TMG-L Archives

Archiver > TMG > 2003-01 > 1041544816


From: Linda Gaylord-Kuhn <>
Subject: RE: [TMG] General tags or VERY specific tags?
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 16:00:16 -0600
In-Reply-To: <3769.68.32.52.232.1041543130.squirrel@mail.whollygenes.com>


Bob Velke said:

<snip>

> Sigh. OK, sorry. I thought that you were being constructive is
> discussing the design decision and offering alternatives. I thought
that
> I was being constructive by giving you some insight into what went
into
> the design decision, what alternatives we considered, and the
conditions
> under which we'd consider changing it. But you portray it as an
argument
> in which I'm bashing your chops.

<snip>

Huh? I _WAS_ being constructive (as is my nature) and what I received
from you was a thinly-veiled insinuation (in public) that I was an idiot
because I preferred UFT's sort routine to that of TMG. Well, I'm no
idiot ... and the unkind tone of your words were not masked by all the
<g>s in the world. I believe it was _you_, Bob, who started the
argument.

May I humbly suggest that you go to the archive and re-read some of your
other responses to this list over the last few days or weeks. They may
sound differently to you now than they did when you wrote them.

Linda


This thread: