TMG-L Archives

Archiver > TMG > 2003-01 > 1041550324


From: Eric Haas <>
Subject: Re[4]: [TMG] General tags or VERY specific tags?
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 18:32:04 -0500
References: <000201c2b2af$a90f2c40$6eb52244@khnlic0umhcfd>
In-Reply-To: <000201c2b2af$a90f2c40$6eb52244@khnlic0umhcfd>


Thursday, January 2, 2003, 5:38:23 PM, you wrote:

LGK> Hi, Eric ... I strongly agree that "before 1800" and "before 1 Jan 1800"
LGK> are NOT equivalent. What I was referring to (in the broader context of
LGK> the discussion) was how did TMG v. UFT sort those dates. Both *SORT*
LGK> dates end up being ... in UFT ... "12/31/1799". Given that limitation,
LGK> the *SORT* dates are equal (not the dates themselves). It's a UFT
LGK> limitation; nothing more. Based on it's own limitations, it's sorting
LGK> as expected.

LGK> Hope that was at least as clear as creek mud. <G>


Okay. I picked up on the fact that you meant the *sort dates* were
identical after I sent that message.

This thread: